Independent practice for UOA clinical programme applicants.
StationReady is an independent MMI practice platform for New Zealand applicants preparing for the University of Auckland Multiple Mini Interview. Each attempt follows the publicly described timing and reviews the reasoning, perspective-taking and communication in the response. The resulting scores are formative practice guidance, not official University marking or a prediction of admission.
Move from identifying the inequity to explaining the mechanism that produces it. Name the structural factor, who it affects, and why the impact is unequal.
Current format according to UOA's published 2026 MMI guidance.
How each attempt is reviewed
Each station assigns three relevant qualities. Ten clear criteria are reviewed for each quality, producing thirty visible decisions rather than one general impression. Core reasoning influences the score more than optional refinement.
The report states which criteria were demonstrated, shows their importance, explains each decision and identifies one practical priority for the next response.
Explore the practice workflow →Each station provides 30 seconds to identify the issue and order the response, followed by a three-minute answer. The prompt remains visible throughout.
Each of the three assigned qualities contains ten clearly defined criteria. The report shows which points matter most, what was demonstrated, what was missing and the evidence used for each decision.
Progress is shown by attribute and station domain. Scores may rise or fall between attempts, while the report identifies the behaviour that changed.
Interactive demonstration
Create a free account to unlock one complete Equity station. A typed response is available, but recording a spoken answer is recommended because the report can also estimate pace and identify captured fillers, repetition and verbal signposting. Each report contains 6 to 14 sentences covering strengths, limitations and the next points to rehearse, then saves the scores and individual feedback to your dashboard.
A regional health service is considering moving specialist follow-up appointments from a rural clinic to a city hospital to reduce operating costs. The service proposes video appointments for patients who cannot travel.
What equity issues should the service consider before making this decision, and how would you approach them?
This takes only a moment.
Seven domains · eight assessed attributes
StationReady does not predict which three attributes will be assessed in a scenario. It trains you to reason naturally across the full set, while recognising which qualities are most relevant to the question in front of you.
Recognise differential impact, contributing factors and the consequences of policy or service choices.
Identify the dilemma, examine several perspectives and justify a fair, reasoned position.
Explain motivation, goals, self-awareness and how you will care for your wellbeing across a health career.
Form a considered view on a current health topic without relying on specialist knowledge.
Reflect on the qualities, interests and patterns that may help or hinder you as a health professional.
Describe a real experience, your contribution, its effect on others and what you learned.
Discuss Māori health with cultural safety, critical thinking and attention to structural determinants.
UOA states that three attributes are assessed per scenario and applicants will not know which three. Across the MMI, applicants can expect all eight to be assessed.
Express ideas clearly and in a logical order, with an appropriate pace, confident delivery and enough explanation for the listener to follow the reasoning.
Recognise that people begin with different barriers and resources, then consider social determinants, systemic discrimination, fairness and human rights in the proposed response.
Identify the competing duties or values, consider more than one defensible perspective and justify a proportionate position without treating the dilemma as overly simple.
Define the central problem, test assumptions, distinguish evidence from inference and connect each conclusion to the reasons that support it.
Respect the person’s account of what is safe, recognise the limits of one’s own cultural viewpoint and consider how power, history and institutions shape an interaction.
Build trust, manage disagreement constructively, share responsibility and adapt one’s role to what the team and situation require.
Respond constructively to setbacks, recognise personal limits, seek support when appropriate and explain a grounded motivation for a health career.
Adjust when new information changes the problem, generate more than one workable option and refine an approach rather than defending the first idea automatically.
How the report is structured
The report shows the ten criteria used for each quality, the decision for every criterion and the relevant evidence from the answer. Scores are then recorded by quality over time.
The third attempt fell from 6 to 5. The later scores improved after feedback focused on linking each structural factor to a practical consequence.
Every criterion, its importance and whether it was demonstrated.
The decision and relevant wording from the response where evidence was present.
Supported pace and verbal observations, kept separate from content scoring.
StationReady and ChatGPT
ChatGPT can be valuable for exploring ideas and asking follow-up questions. StationReady is narrower by design. It removes repeated prompt setup and applies one versioned practice method to every MMI attempt.
The practical benefit is comparability. The question, timing, quality definitions, criterion rules and report structure remain controlled, so a later result can be reviewed against the same framework as an earlier one.
A focused practice environment for the University of Auckland MMI format.
A general conversational assistant that can help across many subjects and tasks.
Opens a fixed, reviewed station with 30 seconds of preparation and a three-minute response window.
Can generate a scenario or discuss an answer, but the user must define the format, timing and assessment instructions.
Marks three assigned qualities against ten visible criteria each, then shows which points matter most, the decision made and the answer evidence used for every criterion.
Can critique an answer using a rubric supplied in the conversation, but standard chats do not automatically use StationReady’s fixed criteria or scoring controls.
Provides 15 fixed seven-station mocks containing 105 versioned questions, so the same material and rubric can be used consistently.
Can create or adapt questions conversationally, which is useful for variety but does not provide the same fixed StationReady bank by default.
Stores reports in a dedicated dashboard and compares performance by assessed quality across attempts.
Can retain conversations and use memory depending on account settings, but does not provide StationReady’s dedicated MMI score history and rubric dashboard.
Keeps the prompt visible, records the timed answer and separates transcript-based pace and captured filler observations from content scores.
Voice supports natural spoken conversation and follow-up discussion, rather than StationReady’s fixed timed-response and criterion-by-criterion report workflow.
Structured rehearsal across distinct questions, comparable scoring, rubric review and progress tracking for this specific interview format.
Open-ended brainstorming, wider background exploration, follow-up questions and practising an unscripted conversation.
Use StationReady when you want a timed attempt, a consistent rubric and a report that can be compared over time. Use ChatGPT when you want to investigate a topic broadly, test alternative explanations or continue an open conversation beyond the station format.
This comparison describes ordinary ChatGPT use. Results can differ when a user supplies detailed instructions, uploads a rubric or creates a specialised GPT. ChatGPT can make mistakes, and StationReady feedback is also formative rather than an official University mark. ChatGPT is an OpenAI product. StationReady is independent of OpenAI and the University of Auckland. OpenAI Voice information · OpenAI Memory information
One-time purchase
Every package lasts 12 months and contains fixed, non-repeating mocks. Choose Mocks 1–5 for NZ$35, Mocks 1–10 for NZ$70, or the complete current bank of Mocks 1–15 for the fixed NZ$99 rate. Each included mock and question can be completed once.
No. StationReady is an independent practice product. It uses public University of Auckland information to align the practice format and published assessment attributes, but it is not operated by, affiliated with or endorsed by the University.
No. Scores are formative estimates produced by the StationReady practice marker. They are not University grades, do not reproduce an official admissions decision, and cannot guarantee an interview or programme outcome.
No. Every practice prompt is original. The scenarios are designed around the seven public domain descriptions without reproducing confidential, recalled, or official interview content.
No. UOA’s guidance emphasises how an applicant discusses a scenario, forms an opinion and articulates it. Feedback therefore focuses on reasoning, balance, perspective and communication rather than rewarding a predetermined belief.
The structure is a rehearsal aid, not a script. Strong answers respond to the actual problem, acknowledge uncertainty, and adapt. The trainer deliberately varies scenarios so the same wording cannot be reused.
After verifying your email, you can complete one original Equity station using the full preparation and response timing. The demonstration includes three relevant quality scores, detailed feedback and a saved report in your dashboard. The other six domains are part of annual access.
StationReady provides independent online MMI practice for University of Auckland applicants in New Zealand. It includes one complimentary station and 15 fixed seven-station mock interviews with realistic timing, spoken or typed responses and evidence-linked feedback. StationReady is not affiliated with the University of Auckland.
Recording a spoken answer is recommended because an interview is spoken. The secure transcript lets the trainer estimate pace and comment on captured fillers, repeated connectors and verbal signposting, while a typed response can only be reviewed for content and structure. Transcription may omit quiet fillers or pauses, so these observations are practical coaching and remain separate from content scores.
Your saved transcript, three quality scores, feedback and limited delivery measures are stored in your private account so that you can review progress over time. Transcript review is off by default, so submitted audio is normally deleted after successful transcription. If review is enabled, audio stays in private processing storage only while you read the transcript; playback is optional, and the audio is deleted after confirmation or discard rather than retained in your progress record. Separately, you can choose whether eligible existing and future practice records may be used to evaluate and improve future StationReady markers. This choice is optional, does not affect access or results, and can be changed in your dashboard.
Useful before you purchase
Each public guide has a distinct purpose: understand the current preparation format, compare the seven domains, practise original questions or inspect exactly how rubric feedback works.
Private account messages
Signed-in students can start a private enquiry about the product, payment, account access or a technical issue. Your message and the StationReady reply remain together in your account, so you can return to the same conversation.
Sign in to ask a questionFor a privacy question before creating an account, email mentoratutoring@gmail.com.