Skip to main content
THE SEVEN PUBLISHED STATION DOMAINS

Understand what each UOA MMI domain is asking you to do.

The domains change the task, not just the topic. This guide separates the high-yield reasoning in each one from vocabulary, rehearsed frameworks and generic advice.

Explore all seven domainsTry original questions
DOMAINS AND QUALITIES

The question type and the assessed qualities are related, but different.

A domain describes the kind of station you receive. A quality describes an attribute the response may demonstrate. One Equity station might assess Equity, Critical thinking and Mental flexibility, while another question can use a different combination.

This is why one universal script is unreliable. The response still needs to identify the task, select relevant reasoning and adapt it to the scenario.

DOMAIN-BY-DOMAIN GUIDE

What strong evidence looks like.

The examples below describe behaviours rather than compulsory phrases. Equivalent reasoning in natural language can be just as strong.

01
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Equity

THE TASK

Explain how a decision, service or policy may affect people differently, then develop a fair and workable response.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

A clinic is moving appointment booking online. What equity issues should it consider, and how should it preserve access?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • A specific unequal effect and the mechanism producing it
  • Variation within a population rather than assumptions about individuals
  • A response linked to the barrier it is intended to reduce
  • Participation, implementation and outcomes that could trigger revision
COMMON LIMIT

Listing population groups or saying a decision is unfair without explaining the barrier, consequence or practical change.

02
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Moral and ethical

THE TASK

Recognise a genuine tension between responsibilities, rights or interests and reach a humane, defensible position.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

A patient asks a clinician to keep important information from their family, who are closely involved in care. How should the clinician respond?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • Relevant stakeholders and what is materially at stake for each
  • A clear or conditional position supported by applied reasoning
  • The strongest reasonable argument against that position
  • Proportionate safeguards, accountability and circumstances that could change the view
COMMON LIMIT

Naming autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence or justice without applying the idea to a fact and practical consequence.

03
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Career choice

THE TASK

Examine motivation and career fit with realistic expectations, self-awareness and a sustainable approach to challenge.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

Your family strongly supports a healthcare career, but you are unsure how independent your own reasons are. How would you examine the decision?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • Specific reasons supported by relevant exploration or experience
  • An honest account of both attractive and difficult parts of healthcare
  • Personal limits, warning signs and realistic support-seeking
  • A process for testing assumptions and adapting if circumstances change
COMMON LIMIT

Relying on wanting to help people, academic interest, prestige or certainty without examining what those motivations mean in practice.

04
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Healthcare issue or topic

THE TASK

Form and communicate a reasoned opinion about a health issue using the information available, without needing specialist knowledge.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

Should a hospital use remote monitoring to discharge some patients earlier? What factors should shape the decision?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • A central issue separated from background information
  • Developed benefits, harms and affected perspectives
  • A conclusion that follows from direct comparison
  • A practical response with limitations, oversight and review
COMMON LIMIT

Reciting facts or calling for more funding, education, consultation or regulation without explaining the mechanism or decision.

05
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Personal insight

THE TASK

Show accurate self-understanding, examine impact and demonstrate how reflection has changed or will change behaviour.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

What is a tendency that can limit your effectiveness in a group, and how are you working on it?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • A relevant and specific example without unnecessary private disclosure
  • The driver behind the behaviour and its effect on other people
  • Another perspective or a gap between intention and impact
  • A concrete change, feedback source and way to judge whether it is working
COMMON LIMIT

Presenting a polished trait or dramatic confession without evidence, impact, changed behaviour or accountable review.

06
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Personal experience

THE TASK

Use a real experience to explain your own decisions, contribution, learning and later application.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

Tell us about a time a team plan did not work as expected. What did you contribute and what changed afterwards?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • Enough context to understand the situation and what you knew at the time
  • Your own actions rather than only what the group achieved
  • The outcome, impact and another person’s perspective where relevant
  • A specific lesson translated into changed future behaviour
COMMON LIMIT

Telling an impressive story in which the student’s own role, reasoning, learning or later change remains unclear.

07
UOA MMI DOMAIN

Hauora Māori

THE TASK

Apply cultural safety, structural understanding and practical partnership while preserving individual choice and avoiding assumptions.

ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT

A service wants to improve trust after Māori patients describe rushed and dismissive consultations. How should it respond?

HIGH-YIELD EVIDENCE
  • A structural, service, geographic, economic or relational mechanism
  • Recognition that Māori people and communities are not homogeneous
  • Patient choice and timely Māori influence over relevant decisions
  • Institutional responsibility, resourcing and Māori-defined or patient-defined outcomes
COMMON LIMIT

Using Māori vocabulary as proof of cultural safety, treating identity as the cause of inequity or assuming every patient wants the same support.

THE EIGHT PUBLISHED QUALITIES

Prepare to demonstrate qualities through decisions and explanations.

A quality should be inferred from what the answer does. Claiming to be empathetic, resilient or culturally safe is not the same as showing the relevant behaviour in the response.

  1. 01Communication
  2. 02Equity
  3. 03Ethical and moral reasoning
  4. 04Critical thinking and quality of argument
  5. 05Cultural safety and self-reflection
  6. 06Collaboration in teamwork and leading in teams
  7. 07Resilience and motivation
  8. 08Mental flexibility and problem solving
FROM READING TO PRACTICE

Complete one station from every domain in a full mock.

StationReady’s current bank contains 15 fixed seven-station mocks. Every prompt is original, and each question and mock can be completed once.

See the full mock format