Equity
Analyse how services, policies and social conditions can affect groups differently, then propose a proportionate response.
Understand the published interview format, learn what each station domain asks of you and use a repeatable method to plan, answer and review a three-minute response.
The University of Auckland states that its 2026 general MMI contains eight stations overall. Seven are assessed scenario stations, with 30 seconds to read and three minutes to respond. The eighth station is used for checks connected with Police Vetting and the Children's Act rather than forming another practice domain.
StationReady full mocks reproduce the seven assessed scenario domains. They do not reproduce the separate administrative check station and do not use recalled or confidential interview questions.
Reviewed against the University's published information in August 2026.
Read the University's current MMI informationEach mock contains one original station from every published domain. The contexts vary so that a rehearsed answer cannot simply be transferred from one question to another.
Analyse how services, policies and social conditions can affect groups differently, then propose a proportionate response.
Identify the central tension, consider affected stakeholders, weigh competing principles and reach a defensible conclusion.
Explain motivation, self-awareness, realistic expectations, resilience and plans for sustainable professional development.
Form a reasoned view on a current health issue without relying on specialist factual knowledge.
Use a relevant personal example to show reflection, self-awareness, learning and an appropriate plan for change.
Describe what happened, your own contribution, what you learned and how that learning changed later behaviour.
Consider cultural safety, structural determinants, Te Tiriti responsibilities and the perspectives of Māori communities without stereotyping.
Identify whether the station asks for ethical judgement, policy analysis, personal reflection or practical problem solving.
Use the preparation period to select a clear sequence rather than trying to write a complete answer.
Connect each concern to the person or group affected and explain why the consequence matters.
Give a clear or conditional view, acknowledge the strongest limitation and state what would make the approach safer.
After the attempt, compare the transcript with the exact rubric decisions rather than relying only on the overall number.
Every station is assigned three relevant qualities. Each quality contains ten transparent criteria. Core reasoning matters most, while supporting and refinement criteria add depth. A point only counts when the idea is applied to the station.
The report shows the complete 0 to 10 rubric, every criterion that was met, every criterion that was not met, the answer excerpt used as evidence and the reason for the decision. Technical vocabulary does not earn a point unless the underlying idea is applied accurately.
See how questions and rubrics were developedStationReady is an independent practice product, not a live tutoring service. The two formats can serve different purposes and may be used together.
On demand, for repeated timed attempts
At booked session times
Consistent criteria with stored evidence and clearly defined priorities
Professional judgement and discussion with the tutor
Repetition, timing, structure and progress tracking
Dialogue, follow-up questions and personalised coaching
AI-assisted feedback may be incomplete or mistaken
Usually costs more per session and provides fewer repetitions
Paid packages unlock Mocks 1–5 for NZ$35, Mocks 1–10 for NZ$70, or Mocks 1–15 for NZ$99 for 12 months. Each included mock and each question can be completed once. Payment is made once and does not renew automatically.
A Multiple Mini Interview uses several short stations to assess non-academic qualities relevant to healthcare training. Applicants respond to different scenarios rather than completing one long interview.
No. Every StationReady scenario is original. The format and domains are aligned only with information the University has made public.
No. The score is formative practice guidance. It is not a University grade, does not reproduce an admissions decision and cannot guarantee entry to a clinical programme.
Speaking is recommended because the MMI is a spoken assessment. A recording allows limited coaching on estimated pace and captured verbal habits, while typed answers can only be reviewed for content and structure.
Not necessarily. It can provide more frequent practice between tutoring sessions, or a lower-cost self-directed option for applicants who do not want live tutoring.
The original station bank, assessment criteria and calibration references were developed and reviewed by current University of Auckland medical students. StationReady remains independent of the University.